Image Courtesy www.screenrant.com |
A recent report from El
Mayimbe of Heroic Hollywood (formerly Latino Review) revealed some new
information about Marvel’s possible plans with their TV shows. Most of it is really exciting, but there’s
one piece that has me extremely confused and a little angry. Let’s start with the exciting.
Image Courtesy comixfactory.blogspot.com |
First, he reveals that
Marvel and ABC are working on a trio of TV series: Cloak and Dagger, Mr. Marvel
(focusing on Kamala Khan), and a Hulk prequel. The Ms. Marvel news isn’t overly
surprising; the rumor a while back was that the series John Ridley was working
on for ABC was Ms. Marvel. I’m
excited to see her, especially now that Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. has
broken open the floodgates for Inhumans.
The same goes for Cloak and Dagger, who are a couple of other
interesting characters, and on the younger side of things as well. The only piece I’m confused about here is the
idea of a Hulk prequel series.
Would they use Ed Norton? Mark
Ruffalo? Some other guy? When would this take place in relation to the
movies? I’d rather if they introduce all
new characters on the small screen and push the narrative forward. The only “prequels” I’m interested in are
really far in the past, a la Agent Carter-era. If they want a Hulk on the small-screen, my
vote would be She-Hulk, especially if they can pair her with Matt Murdock, as
both are lawyers.
The next piece of
information is kind of a no-brainer. A.K.A.
Jessica Jones will feature more crossover with Daredevil than Daredevil
did with A.K.A. Jessica Jones.
Considering that Daredevil was basically the Iron Man of
Marvel Netflix, we couldn’t really expect a lot of crossover with other
properties since they didn’t have casts yet.
Now that Daredevil is out there and has a full cast, the
floodgates can open to a ton of crossovers with the other Netflix series (and
perhaps even Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.).
My guess for crossovers with A.K.A. Jessica Jones is that
anyone’s an option, but Father Lantom, Claire Temple, and Melvin Potter are the
most likely candidates.
www.netflix.com |
There is also a rumor
about Netflix Phase 2 out. You may
remember my article
a while back about Netflix Phase 2.
Well, according to El Mayimbe, Punisher, Blade, and Ghost Rider are all
possibilities for Phase 2, though someone is balking at the gore level and the
CGI cost for Ghost Rider. I would be
interested in seeing all of these at some point, but I wonder if Marvel is going
to throw all of these guys out there cold.
I think Punisher would work well as a guest character or recurring
character for a season of Daredevil before spinning him off to his own
series.
The rumor also holds
that Daredevil season 2 “won’t air for a while,” which is a little
disappointing but not overly surprising considering that they are supposedly
trying to get Luke Cage and Iron Fist out next year, as
well. I think they could still do it,
but it would probably be a strain on the production and post-production people.
The third
Netflix-related rumor is that there is a pipedream of a limited Netflix movie
or mini-series centered on Hawkeye and Black Widow. And I think that would be awesome as a way to
tell their story even though there is not enough space in the films to tell
everything, and the film schedule is too busy for a lower-budget,
superpower-less spy thriller, anyways.
Netflix would be a great place for the two of them.
Now, on to the rumor
that has me confused and angry.
Here is the quote from
El Mayimbe:
Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. has been using the Inhumans recently, but that might change once the Inhumans movie scheduled for 2019 comes along. It’s a good bet the movie will ignore all or most of what the TV show has done.
Did you catch
that? “It’s a good bet the movie will
ignore all or most of what the TV show has done.”
What?
Image Courtesy en.wikipedia.org |
If this were DC where
they don’t even pretend that there’s a connection between the movies and shows,
I would forgive them. But this
isn’t. This is the Marvel Cinematic
Universe, where Agent Sitwell can walk off the set of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
and straight onto the set of Captain America: The Winter Soldier, where
the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. cast can be Thor’s garbage collectors. We expect there to be continuity between what
happens in one medium and what happens in the next.
In other words, the
Inhumans on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. need to be the same as those in the Inhumans
movie.
Don’t misunderstand
me; I’m not saying that the AoS cast needs to be the cast of the Inhumans
movie (though having 1 or 2 characters show up in some capacity would be a nice
touch). What I am saying is that the
Inhuman culture and mythos established during AoS season 2 should be the
same culture and mythos in which the Inhumans movie takes place. Terrigenesis can look slightly different due
to budgetary differences (they have those kind of slight differences with the
Bifrost effect, too), but it shouldn’t look like a completely different
process. The Inhumans shouldn’t be the
results of Chitauri experimentation instead of Kree (and that really wouldn’t
make sense, anyways). Based on the universe
they have been setting up, it just wouldn’t make sense for them to establish
the Inhumans one way on TV, and then completely change them when they show up
in the movies.
So much for the
continuity reasons for holding onto and using the Inhumans as established on AoS. But there’s an even simpler reason: time.
If Joss Whedon had
completely ignored the first 5 MCU movies when writing The Avengers, how
much time would it have taken him to satisfactorily introduce the 6 heroes,
tell their origins, and establish their powers and personalities? Easily an hour (averaging out to 10 minutes
per character), and probably more. And that
would be pushing it. However, because he
had 10 hours of prior material to build off of, he was able to give brief
introductions to each and get it all over with in maybe 15 minutes, possibly
less (I haven’t timed it).
Image Courtesy marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com |
With the Inhumans, you
can easily take that hour and add another 30 minutes, and that’s how much time
it would take to establish the Inhumans as a race and culture, and explain
Terrigenesis, and everything else they would need to do. And that’s before trying to introduce us to
the Royal Family. An hour and a half out
of a two-hour movie, all to introduce and explain what Agents of
S.H.I.E.L.D. established over the course of a full season. Even if it doesn’t take the movie an hour and
a half, it would still require a lot of screen time, taking away from the
movie’s ability to tell a good story.
Now, I’m not
suggesting that the movie should ignore all those questions and assume that
everyone will watch Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. before seeing the movie
(though everyone could). There are going
to be people for whom this is their first Marvel movie. There are going to be people who ignore the
TV shows. For these people, establishing
who the Inhumans are will be important.
However, when you have 6 seasons of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. to fall
back on, you don’t need to devote as much time to establishing the Inhumans as
you would otherwise. In the Avengers
example, Joss Whedon got all that establishing stuff out of the way in 15
minutes interspersed throughout the first act.
If they are relying on the Inhumans as we’ve seen them on AoS,
the Inhumans movie could easily do it in the same time frame, or even
less.
I’m not looking for The
Inhumans to just be a movie based on the Inhumans introduced in Agents
of S.H.I.E.L.D. I’m just looking for
the MCU to have a high degree of continuity between all its different
parts. It makes sense for the shared
universe, and it makes sense for the movie itself.
Do you think I’m
overreacting to this? Do you want to see
less continuity between the TV Inhumans and the movie Inhumans? Do you want to see more continuity
there, like a few of the Inhumans introduced on TV crossing over to the
movie? Let me know in the comments!
If you want to get an
email whenever I publish a new article, go to the top of the page and enter
your email address in the box labeled “Subscribe to Mostly MCU Reviews” and
click “Submit.”
I think you're overreacting a bit because unless AoS becomes a mega hit in the next couple of years most moviegoers wont have it as a frame of reference. Story wise it probably wouldn't matter anyway as what we see in AoS is more like Marvel's mutants, a group of people feared for being different and clinging together for safety, whereas Attilan's Inhumans are an ancient society with unique philosophy, culture, and everyone is accepted and safe.
ReplyDeleteI also think you overestimate how long it would take to establish enough about Inhumans for an audience to invest in the story.
Open the movie with a Blackbolt and Attilan introduction like this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPNGnPIkanY&list=PLBrrfZs-ew7P9LSyaId5yBmkoNsgF9s6v&index=10
Follow it with a Terrigenesis ceremony overseen by the royal family like this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9htisOeVx_s&list=PLBrrfZs-ew7P9LSyaId5yBmkoNsgF9s6v&index=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi8w3oyquFA&index=3&list=PLBrrfZs-ew7P9LSyaId5yBmkoNsgF9s6v
Then transition into a scene that establishes the conflict like Blackbolt visiting Maximus in prison or the royal family discussing the rogue Inhumans. I'd say that would take a lot less time than an hour.
On TV/Movie crossover big things seem unlikely but if the script calls for generic Inhumans transitioning from life on Earth to Attilan it may as well be someone form AoS, and its the subtler style I'd prefer. Thank you in advance for taking the time to read my giant-size comment.
They need a New Hulk TV series with 99 episodes and cast first class leading role unkown actor that looks like Edward Norton.
ReplyDelete